CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

gateway-workers

Build, debug, or review Cloudflare Workers invoked by the Forward action in Gateway HTTP policies, including the GatewayMiddleware entrypoint, Gateway types, context, and continuation.

Quality

82%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is gateway-workers in cloudflare/skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A lean, dense body that concentrates entirely on non-obvious Gateway-specific behavior (entrypoint contract, next() semantics, context getters, inspection order, limitations) and backs it with explicit validation steps. The only notable gap is the lack of an inline minimal code example and inline error-recovery guidance, both deferred to linked Cloudflare docs.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Every sentence carries non-obvious, skill-specific facts (e.g., "next() always targets the original destination... cannot redirect, retry, or fan out"; "Treat a falsy identity (!identity) as anonymous") with no padding and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. It matches the 5 anchor: lean and efficient, every token earns its place.

5 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is concrete at the API level ("Export a named GatewayMiddleware class extending WorkerEntrypoint from cloudflare:workers", "Implement handle(request, context, next)", "next(request) at most once") with concrete validation commands. It falls short of 5 because there is no inline code example and key implementation details are deferred to external template pages.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The 5-step workflow is clearly sequenced and paired with an explicit Validation section ("Type-check against the installed Gateway types and test the named RPC entrypoint... test a permitted request through a scoped Gateway Forward policy") plus a response-rules checklist. It falls short of 5 because error-recovery feedback loops are delegated to the external guide's troubleshooting steps rather than stated inline.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is under 50 lines with no bundle files, and everything is well organized into clearly signaled sections whose external references (Forward guide, worker templates, context reference, related skills) are one level deep. Under the simple-skill guideline, this earns a 5 with just well-organized sections.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A highly specific, third-person description with concrete actions and named technical components that clearly delineate the Gateway Forward Worker niche. Its main weakness is the absence of an explicit "Use when..." trigger clause, which caps completeness and leaves the activation context only weakly implied.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. "Use when building or debugging Workers for Gateway HTTP Forward policies, or when the user mentions GatewayMiddleware, Forward action, or Gateway HTTP policy interception."

Include common synonyms users might say, such as "Cloudflare One", "Zero Trust", or "WARP", to improve trigger term coverage and distinguish it from general Cloudflare Workers skills.

State when NOT to use it (e.g., ordinary Workers not invoked by Gateway Forward policies) to reduce overlap with general Workers skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description lists multiple concrete actions ("Build, debug, or review") plus named technical components ("GatewayMiddleware entrypoint, Gateway types, context, and continuation"), giving comprehensive coverage of this niche. It fits the 5 anchor rather than 4 because there are no meaningful gaps in what it claims to cover.

5 / 5

Completeness

The "what" is clearly and specifically stated, but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance; the Gateway Forward phrasing only weakly implies when to use it. Per the judging guidelines, a missing 'Use when' clause caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Core natural keywords are present ("Cloudflare Workers", "Gateway", "Forward", "HTTP policies"), which a user in this domain would naturally say. A few common variations are missing (e.g., "Cloudflare One", "Zero Trust", "WARP"), so it falls just short of the 5 anchor's comprehensive synonym coverage.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Invoked by the Forward action in Gateway HTTP policies" carves out a clear niche, but generic requests like "build a Cloudflare Worker" (non-Gateway) could still trigger this skill, creating minor overlap with closely related Workers skills. This matches the 4 anchor (mostly distinct, minor overlap risk) better than the 5 anchor.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 3 suspicious

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

MesilimLLC/api.trackdub

Path

.commandcode/skills/gateway-workers/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.