Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, well-structured instruction for a simple skill: it gives concrete link syntax and clear sub-instructions with a single well-signaled reference. Its main weakness is the absence of a complete worked example that ties the three bullets together.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; the single contextual sentence states a project-specific fact and every bullet earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready link syntax examples (`[term](../path/to/file.ts)` and `[term](#term)`), but lacks a complete worked example of a full glossary entry applying all three bullets, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear single-purpose flow with a stated trigger condition and a well-ordered 'When doing so' list; not 5 because the trigger uses soft 'consider adding' phrasing and there is no verification step, though none is strictly required for a non-destructive task. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, well-organized into a contextual paragraph plus a bullet list, with a single clearly signaled one-level reference to the glossary file; no nested or buried references, matching the simple-skill exception for a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |