Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable onboarding script with clear branching and concrete examples. Its main weakness is some conversational padding in the intro and a vague closing instruction.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with tight bullet examples and numbered steps, but the conversational opener ('Hi, I'm Ben and this is OpenWork. It's an open-source alternative...') and the explanation paragraph add padding Claude does not need, matching the 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation' anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete example prompts ('Summarize the files in this workspace.', 'Create a checklist for my week.'), numbered setup steps, and specific config references (opencode.json, Skills/Plugins tabs, doc links), giving mostly executable guidance with only minor gaps like the vague 'End with two friendly next actions'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The flow is a clearly sequenced ask-then-branch process: ask technical level via the question tool, route to a tailored branch, then close with next actions; no destructive or batch operations apply so the validation cap does not trigger, but the closing step is underspecified. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, has no need for external bundle references, and is organized into clearly labeled sections (non-technical, Skills and plugins, technical), satisfying the simple-skill exception that lets progressive disclosure score 5 on well-organized sections alone. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |