Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of lean, executable skill content: complete commands with dry-run safety, both migration variants covered, and skill-specific gotchas. The only meaningful gap is the absence of explicit error-recovery guidance after the validate step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and command-driven with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows; every section (Goal, Guardrails, Workflow, Gotchas) carries skill-specific, non-obvious information. Only trivial overlap exists between Guardrails/Gotchas and the workflow steps, which is closer to anchor 5 (every token earns its place) than anchor 4. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable npx ai-agent-skills commands are provided for both migration paths (vendor for house copies, catalog for upstream picks), each shown with a --dry-run run followed by the real invocation, plus build-docs and validate commands. This matches anchor 5 (copy-paste ready commands covering the common cases), not anchor 4 which implies gaps. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The six steps are clearly sequenced with dry-run checkpoints before every mutating command and a final validate step, satisfying anchor 4 (clear sequence, most checkpoints present). It falls short of anchor 5 because there is no error-recovery feedback loop explaining what to do if validate fails or a dry-run reports a collision. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | There are no bundle files and none are needed; the compact body is organized into clear Goal, Guardrails, Workflow, and Gotchas sections with no content that belongs in a separate file. Per the rubric's simple-skill guidance, well-organized sections in a self-contained skill warrant anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |