Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an unusually strong operational document: every rule is concrete, sourced from real failure modes (silent wrong-data on bad tickers, API_NOT_FOUND, file_path omissions), and organized into a clear workflow with worked examples and stop conditions. Its main structural weakness is that it is a monolith — the 25-source capability table, boundary notes, and watchlist spec would be better split into reference files for progressive disclosure. Minor duplication of the ticker-verification caution could be trimmed.
Suggestions
Move the 25-row datasource capability table and the '能力边界参考' notes to references/datasources.md, keeping SKILL.md to the workflow, hard rules, and a compact selection summary — this also trims ~60 lines from the always-loaded context.
Consider moving the watchlist.json format spec to references/watchlist.md or shortening it, since it is a niche feature relative to the core workflow.
Deduplicate the ticker-verification caution (stated fully in §3.1 and again in §6) to reclaim a few lines.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with genuinely non-obvious operational knowledge — capability boundaries ("yahoo_finance 的外汇历史最多 2 年"), batch limits ("实时接口最多 3 个 ticker，历史接口最多 10 个"), error strings, and the split-CSV A/HK quirk — with almost no padding or explanation of things Claude already knows. It falls short of anchor 5 only through minor repetition (ticker-verification caution appears in both §3.1 and §6) and the example-question column of the table, which could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: exact MCP tool names, concrete parameter JSON in worked examples ("{\"name\":\"stock_finance_data\"}" and a complete params object with ticker 600519.SH, dates, and file_path), literal error messages ("Missing required parameters: file_path"), specific batch sizes, and file-naming conventions. The one abstraction ("<文档里写的 api>") is explicitly justified flexibility — the skill deliberately defers API tables to the runtime desc call, which the rubric permits when justified. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 6-step numbered workflow plus three worked examples gives a clear sequence, and there are real checkpoints: pre-flight ticker verification via web_search, stop conditions ("结果成功且已经覆盖问题时停止调用"), batching rules, and explicit error-handling guidance ("汇报错误给用户，不要硬试"). It falls short of anchor 5 because there is no validate-then-fix retry loop — though for read-only data retrieval, error recovery is 'report and stop', which is reasonable but not the full feedback-loop pattern of the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are all absent), so all ~170 lines live in SKILL.md: the 25-row datasource capability table, the capability-boundary notes, three worked examples, and watchlist documentation are inlined in one file with clear section headers but no references at all. This matches anchor 3 (some structure, content that could be separate is inline) — the table plus boundary notes would sit naturally in a references/ file while SKILL.md keeps the workflow and hard rules. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |