Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, concise skill body that lays out a clear sequenced process with a reusable plan template and an explicit user-approval feedback loop. Its main gap is the absence of a post-write validation step to confirm the plan file is correct.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step after writing the plan file (e.g., re-read it to confirm phases are vertical slices and acceptance criteria are present).
Specify how to handle the iteration loop concretely (e.g., track which phases the user asked to merge or split and update the numbered list before re-asking).
Consider moving the plan template into a referenced file if the skill grows, to keep SKILL.md as a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence, using terse process steps and a compact template rather than explaining what a PRD or tracer bullet is; only minor phrasing could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance is present via a full plan template, explicit file path/naming, and a structured quiz step; it is instruction-oriented so executable code is not expected, with only minor gaps in specifying how to iterate with the user. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence is given with an explicit user-approval checkpoint ('Iterate until the user approves the breakdown'), though it lacks an explicit validation/verify-output step after writing the plan file. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a self-contained overview with a well-organized Process section and an inlined template; no bundle files exist so structure is internal, and it is appropriately organized with only minor gains possible from splitting the template out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |