Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly structured, highly actionable workflow skill with an exemplary validation feedback loop and clear phase sequencing. Its main gaps are minor redundancy between the Workflow and Boundaries sections and the absence of a full step.toml template.
Suggestions
Add a minimal filled-in step.toml example block so contributors have a copy-paste starter instead of only a field checklist.
De-duplicate the Boundaries Do/Don't section against the Generate phase rules to recover token budget.
Resolve the README.md mismatch: the description promises a per-step README.md but the Generate phase never creates one — either add it to the file list or drop the claim.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean checklist-and-bullet directives that assume Claude's competence, but the Boundaries Do/Don't lists restate generation rules already covered in the Workflow phase and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete commands ('uv run pytest tests/steps -q'), exact paths, enumerated schema fields, and two worked transcripts give actionable guidance; the gap is that step.toml is specified as a field checklist rather than a copy-paste template. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-phase sequence (Orient → Generate → Validate → Summarize) with an explicit validate→fix→re-run feedback loop and a two-failure escape hatch, plus checklists for inputs, generation rules, and the summary. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single file with clear section headers that points to live repo example files rather than nesting documents; some detailed schema/generation lists could be externalized but the structure navigates well. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |