Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a compact, highly actionable reference: concrete MCP calls, an executable computation snippet, a clear artifacts map, and a numbered troubleshooting section, all well-organized with no unnecessary padding. It scores strongly on every dimension.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — direct MCP tool-call examples, a compact artifacts tree, and targeted gotchas (the PENDING/RUNNING exclusion note) with every token earning its place. It avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready MCP calls (search_runs_by_tags, query_runs, get_artifact_content), an executable uv/pandas snippet, and complete JSON config blocks for both Claude Code and Cursor — fully actionable rather than abstract. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The query workflow is clearly sequenced (ID convention → query runs → fetch artifacts → compute in Python) and troubleshooting is a numbered checklist; the skill is read-only so no destructive/batch validation feedback loop is required, avoiding the score-2 cap. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single self-contained file (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ bundles exist) organized into clearly headed sections (MCP Server, ID Convention, Querying Runs, Artifacts Structure, Troubleshooting) with no nested references, satisfying the well-organized-sections criterion. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |