Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, token-efficient skill body that gives executable commands, a clear sequenced workflow with a checkpoint, and a useful output template plus benign-pattern table. It assumes Claude's competence and stays appropriately self-contained.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows (no primers on pipelines, Slurm, or CUDA); every line earns its place, e.g. 'errors surface at the end' justifies the tail-based read. Not score 2 because there is no unnecessary explanation to tighten. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable commands — the find/tail log-reading loop, the ls discovery one-liner, and the uv re-run invocation — that are copy-paste ready; the only placeholder (<exp_id>) is justified because Step 0 shows how to discover it. Not score 2 because the guidance is concrete rather than pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence (Step 0–4) with a conditional checkpoint ('If no experiments exist, ask the user') and a concrete analysis checklist in Step 2; this is a read-only diagnosis task so the destructive/batch feedback-loop cap does not apply. Not score 2 because checkpoints are explicit rather than implicit. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the body is self-contained, single-purpose, and well-organized into clear sections with nothing that needs splitting out (the benign-patterns table is short and useful inline); per the simple-skills note, well-organized content scores 3 without external references. Not score 2 because organization is clear and there are no nested or poorly-signaled references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |