Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured planning workflow with an exact report contract and explicit stop conditions; it earns top conciseness marks. It stops short of full marks on actionability and workflow clarity because key discovery and validation detail lives in external _shared references rather than inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient prose that assumes Claude's competence, with no concept padding and every section earning its place; matches the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete, copy-paste-ready report template and structured actionable steps, but discovery and validation guidance delegate to external _shared references rather than being fully self-contained executable instructions. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced workflow with explicit stop conditions and a hard-stop gate ('Stop discovery when current evidence supports one coherent plan'), though some validation checkpoints live in referenced files rather than inline, leaving a minor gap versus the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with clearly signaled one-level-deep _shared references and no local bundle files; structure is good with only minor organization gaps, fitting just below the clear-overview top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |