Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-sequenced procedural workflow with explicit validation checkpoints and a clean one-level-deep reference structure; its only weakness is the absence of copy-paste executable commands in the body, which requires reading the bundled scripts for exact invocations.
Suggestions
Include one or two concrete example invocations of collect-release-ledger.py (or a pointer to its --help output shape) so the body is actionable without first opening the script.
Add a short worked example of a completed concern record (filled DEP-<number> template) inline or in contract-audit.md to make the resolve-concerns step immediately executable.
Surface the exact selector/pin command or snippet for Hermes base-image publication in hermes.md so the publish step can be executed without re-deriving the command.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Terse imperative style with no concept over-explanation ('Treat an upgrade as a migration, not a version edit', 'Change only the NVIDIA/NemoClaw checkout in scope'); every section is task-relevant policy or procedure with no padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete numbered steps, named scripts (collect-release-ledger.py), named paths (internal/security-reviews/), and a concern-record template in the references, but the body itself contains no copy-paste executable commands — the reader must inspect each script's --help for exact invocations. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence (Plan → Discover → Audit → Resolve → Verify) with explicit validation checkpoints, a blocking condition ('An unresolved high-impact concern blocks the upgrade'), and a 'Before handoff' checklist covering recheck, disposition, selector agreement, and gate separation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Overview body points to three one-level-deep references (release-ledger.md, hermes.md, contract-audit.md) and two scripts, each clearly signaled with its purpose; the references do not nest further into document chains, so navigation is easy. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |