Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary progressive-disclosure index: concise, well-organized, with real one-level references and concrete per-use-case reading orders. The only gap is the absence of an explicit validation/retry feedback loop in the answering workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean manifest/index: one-line file descriptions plus brief answering rules, with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, ordered reading lists per use case ('Read workflow-policy.md, project-workflow.md, and daily-flow.md in that order') and specific directives ('Use label-taxonomy.json to validate allowed values'), with only minor gaps in fully spelled-out procedures. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences the two main workflows (workflow questions vs agent implementation) with ordered references and explicit guardrails ('Do not invent labels'), but lacks an explicit validate-fix-retry feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview manifest with well-signaled, one-level-deep references; every referenced file exists in references/ and each is annotated with its scope, enabling easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |