CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

nemoclaw-maintainer-runtime-provider

Implement or review a NemoClaw managed runtime provider through RuntimeProviderBundle, qualification-backed activation, provider-neutral orchestration, and E2E qualification. Use for a new native provider, provider activation, or runtime-provider architecture work. Do not use for the portable experimental profile.

70

Quality

86%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, lean instruction set that sequences a multi-step provider workflow with explicit validation gates and offloads detail to three clearly-signaled reference files. It is highly actionable for its domain; the only modest gap is the absence of runnable commands or code snippets.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and imperative, assumes Claude's competence, and avoids explaining what a runtime provider or bundle is; every section earns its place without padding.

5 / 5

Actionability

It names concrete targets — specific files (contract.ts, registry.ts, activation.ts), named contracts (RuntimeProviderBundle, createCurrentRuntimeProviderBundles(...), SandboxEntry.openshellDriver), and named surfaces/states — but offers no copy-paste commands or runnable examples, leaving minor gaps versus the top anchor.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The phases (Confirm Product Scope → Load Current Authority → Choose the Delivery State → Implement → Validate and Qualify → Report) are clearly sequenced with validation checkpoints such as "Reject missing, unknown, reused, or drifted authority before mutation" and "Stop implementation until maintainers accept the contract change," with only minor checkpoint gaps.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The SKILL.md is a concise overview that points to three real one-level-deep references (api-contract.md, activation-and-qualification.md, implementation-and-review.md), each clearly signaled with a "Read X before Y" purpose, plus one cross-skill link, giving easy navigation.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is a strong, third-person statement that answers both what the skill does and when to use it, with an explicit out-of-scope boundary that sharply lowers conflict risk. It is concise and well-scoped, with only minor room to make the named actions more concrete and broaden trigger synonyms.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions within the domain — "Implement or review a NemoClaw managed runtime provider through RuntimeProviderBundle, qualification-backed activation, provider-neutral orchestration, and E2E qualification" — though terms like "qualification-backed activation" and "provider-neutral orchestration" remain somewhat abstract, leaving minor gaps versus the comprehensive anchor.

4 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly states what the skill does and when to use it ("Use for..."), and adds a concrete negative boundary ("Do not use for the portable experimental profile"), matching the anchor that answers both what and when with concrete triggers.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The "Use for a new native provider, provider activation, or runtime-provider architecture work" clause provides good natural trigger coverage for this specialized niche, but lacks the synonym/variation breadth of the top anchor.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The tightly scoped NemoClaw managed-runtime-provider niche plus the explicit "Do not use for the portable experimental profile" exclusion give it a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 1 suspicious

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
NVIDIA/NemoClaw
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.