Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, technically dense skill body with strong workflow sequencing, explicit validation/feedback loops, and clean progressive disclosure; only minor redundancy and delegated detail keep conciseness and actionability from full marks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and assumes Claude's competence (no explaining what PCIe or DT overlays are), but the 'do not edit ODMDATA' invariant is restated across Overview, Procedure Step 6, and Limitations — minor redundancy that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete commands and artifacts are named (`dtc`, `fdtoverlay`, `dmesg | grep pcie`, `pin_verifier.py`, the `/* custom-bsp: pcie:pcie@<addr> */` marker, sidecar paths), but full executable detail is delegated to references/procedure.md, leaving minor gaps in the body itself. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced nine-step flow with explicit validation checkpoints (pre-flight `dtc`+`fdtoverlay`, Step 8 ODMDATA-vs-overlay consistency cross-check, refuse-if-missing gates) and a feedback loop that stops and asks the user on contradictory rows rather than auto-recovering. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that delegates the full walkthrough to references/procedure.md and gotchas.md (both real, one level deep), with a well-signaled References section enumerating sibling skills and shared docs for easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |