Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is admirably concise and gives concrete, actionable craft directives for script adaptation. Its gaps are the lack of a sequenced workflow with checkpoints and an orphaned reference file that is never linked from the overview.
Suggestions
Link the bundled reference explicitly, e.g. add 'For episode/scene structure details, see [episode-scene-craft.md](references/episode-scene-craft.md)' so progressive disclosure is navigable.
Add one short worked example showing the expected output format (e.g. a scene header + action line + dialogue) to make the production format concrete.
Lightly sequence the bullets into an ordered adaptation flow (preserve source → convert interiority → build scenes → handle episodic structure → deliver) with a final verification check against the user's adaptation boundary.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean set of directive bullets with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line carries a usable instruction. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Bullets give concrete craft directives ('Convert interiority into behavior, dialogue, blocking, props…', 'Build scenes around objective, resistance, turn, consequence'), but no output example illustrates the requested production format for common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The content is a set of parallel craft principles rather than a sequenced workflow, and there are no explicit validation checkpoints; the skill is not destructive/batch so no lower cap applies. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized with a clear title and bullets, but the bundled references/episode-scene-craft.md is never linked or signaled from SKILL.md, leaving a reference present but not discoverable. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |