Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, well-structured diagnostic guide that respects token budget and uses a single clean reference, with only slightly under-numbered workflow steps and room for more concrete examples.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it lists diagnostic principles and a single reference pointer with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance is given throughout (named defect types to scan for, what to preserve), and as an instruction-only skill the absence of code is not penalized; it stops just short of fully copy-paste-ready examples. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear diagnostic sequence is implied (diagnose → distinguish defect vs voice → scan → audit/reviser → preserve → respond) with a scope checkpoint ("audit first when scope is unclear; use the reviser") and a truthfulness guardrail, though steps are not explicitly numbered. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise overview points to one clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference ("Load `references/semantic-cleanup.md`") that exists as a real file, with the split appropriately placed. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |