Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-crafted, lean instruction skill: a clear sequenced process, specific actionable checklists for what to flag, explicit judgment/triage rules as quality checkpoints, and clean section organization. It respects Claude's competence and stays within scope.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains basic finance or spreadsheet concepts, and each section (Problem, When to Use, Process, Evidence Rules, Output) is brief and load-bearing, so it stays at the top anchor rather than the 'could be tightened' anchor 2. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, specific checklists rather than vague direction — e.g. flag 'unsupported growth, margin leaps, pricing optimism, CAC efficiency, churn stability, and timing shortcuts' and 'circular reasoning, hidden hard-codes, inconsistent periods, or unsupported roll-forwards'; per the scoring note, absence of code in an instruction-only skill is not penalized when guidance is this actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequenced Process (Frame → Identify shape → Review assumptions → Review structure → Review scenarios → Convert to judgment → Optionally Open Brain) paired with a dedicated 'Evidence and Judgment Rules' checklist that acts as explicit judgment checkpoints; no validation loop is required because this is a non-destructive review task. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/scripts/assets are empty), so disclosure is judged on organization: the body is split into well-labeled sections with no monolithic wall and no content that cries out for a separate file, satisfying the well-organized anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |