Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a clean, well-organized template skeleton that is token-efficient but contains no actionable content — every section is an authoring prompt awaiting real instructions. It scores well on structure and brevity but fails on delivering executable guidance.
Suggestions
Replace placeholder prompts with concrete, executable instructions or code examples under each section.
For any multi-step or destructive workflow, add explicit validation/verification checkpoints with commands.
Fill in real trigger conditions, edge cases, and output expectations rather than generic labels.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean ~35-line skeleton with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line is a short structural prompt. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides only placeholder prompts ('First action the skill should take', 'What recurring problem does this skill solve?') with no concrete code, commands, or specific guidance. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered 1-2-3 sequence with a 'Verification or handoff' step exists, but the steps are placeholder labels with no real validation checkpoints or content. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | It is under 50 lines with well-organized sections and no bundle files, so the simple-skill allowance applies and the structure is clear. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |