CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

create-ideas

Generate ideas in one shot using creative sampling

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/sdd/skills/create-ideas/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a tight, actionable, single-purpose instruction skill with clear numeric constraints and good organization. Its main weakness is the ambiguous bracketed distribution choice and a small piece of opening fluff.

Suggestions

Resolve the bracketed choice into a concrete instruction, e.g. "sample 3 high-probability responses from the full distribution and 3 low-probability responses from the tails".

Remove the filler opener "You are a helpful assistant." to tighten the lead.

Specify the output format concretely (e.g. a markdown list with each item as `text (probability)`) so the result is copy-paste ready.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and instructional with no padding about concepts Claude already knows; the only minor over-explanation is the opening "You are a helpful assistant.", placing it just below the fully-lean score-5 anchor and at the score-4 anchor of efficient with minor trimmable bits.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, specific guidance is given (6 responses, list items with text + numeric probability, first 3 > 0.80, last 3 < 0.10, no overlap), which is actionable for an instruction-only skill; the bracketed "[full distribution / tails of the distribution]" choice leaves a small gap, matching the score-4 anchor of mostly executable guidance with minor gaps.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

As a single-purpose skill the action is largely unambiguous with a clear bulleted breakdown of constraints, but the unresolved distribution choice and lack of any output check introduce minor ambiguity, fitting score-4 (single action mostly unambiguous) rather than the fully-unambiguous score-5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines, has no need for external references, no bundle files exist, and content is organized under an H1 with clear bullets, so per the simple-skill exception it earns a 5 for well-organized structure without external file references.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

48%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description conveys a clear core action but omits any "Use when..." trigger guidance, capping completeness at 3, and relies on a single natural keyword plus jargon. It is distinct enough to avoid most conflicts yet under-specified for trigger discovery.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. "Use when the user asks to brainstorm, generate, or suggest ideas for a topic or problem."

Include natural synonyms (brainstorm, suggest, ideate) so users' varied phrasing matches the skill.

Drop or clarify "creative sampling" jargon in favor of a concrete capability description.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ("ideas") and a single concrete action ("Generate ideas"), but offers only one minimal action with "creative sampling" as methodology rather than a second action; this matches the score-2 anchor of naming the domain with minimal actions better than the two-action score-3 anchor.

2 / 5

Completeness

It states a clear "what" ("Generate ideas") but provides no "Use when..." trigger guidance, so per the rubric cap the score cannot exceed 3 and aligns with the anchor for a clear what with a missing when.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"Generate ideas" is a relevant natural phrase a user might say, but it lacks common synonyms (brainstorm, suggestions, concepts) and relies on the jargony "creative sampling", fitting the score-3 anchor of some relevant keywords missing common variations.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Generate ideas in one shot" carves a fairly distinct niche with minor overlap risk against general brainstorming skills, matching the score-4 anchor of mostly distinct with minor overlap risk rather than the broader score-3 anchor.

4 / 5

Total

12

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit

Path

plugins/sdd/skills/create-ideas/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.