Content
56%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill is a highly actionable orchestration playbook with a clear phased workflow and concrete agent prompts, but it is bloated by an over-scaffolded report template and inlines content that belongs in separate reference files. Restructuring would improve both token efficiency and navigability.
Suggestions
Move the three judge prompts into references/ (e.g. references/judge-prompts.md) and the report template into references/report-template.md, leaving SKILL.md as a lean overview with one-level-deep links.
Trim the report template's empty placeholder sections (e.g. bare "### High Priority / [Important but not blocking]") down to the sections that actually carry content.
Add a validation checkpoint in Phase 4 instructing the coordinator to re-check each judge's output against the expected structure before synthesizing the consensus report.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 477-line body includes noticeable padding: a ~150-line report template with empty placeholder sections ("### High Priority / [Important but not blocking]") and a context section explaining patterns Claude already understands, fitting anchor 2 (several unnecessary or padded sections). | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is mostly executable: copy-paste-ready agent prompts with explicit output structures, a concrete implementation note ("Use the Task tool with subagent_type=\"general-purpose\" to spawn these three agents in parallel"), a full report template, and usage examples. Minor gaps (no fallback if an agent output deviates from the template) keep it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-phase sequence (scope confirmation → parallel judges → debate → consensus report) with checkpoints in Phase 1 (scope confirmation) and a conditional debate trigger in Phase 3; not 5 because there is no explicit checkpoint verifying judge outputs conform to the expected structure before synthesis. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned but entirely monolithic: the three judge prompts and full report template (~350 lines of payload that clearly belongs in separate reference files) are inlined, and no references/ bundle exists — anchor 3 (some structure, but content that should be separate is inline). | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |