Content
50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-sectioned and rich with concrete, reusable prompt examples, but it is a ~560-line monolith that inlines three documents which should be one-level-deep reference files, and it repeatedly explains fundamentals (context windows, few-shot, chain-of-thought) that Claude already knows. It also contains mechanical defects: broken code-fence markers ('````markdown theme={null}'), a stray duplicated section header, and typos ('Usefull').
Suggestions
Split the three major sections into one-level-deep reference files (e.g. references/patterns.md, references/agent-prompting.md, references/persuasion.md) and keep SKILL.md as a lean overview that links to them.
Cut explanations of concepts Claude already knows — the context-window definition paragraph, the input/output phase walkthrough, and generic few-shot/chain-of-thought primers — keeping only the actionable patterns and examples.
Fix the broken code fences ('````markdown theme={null}'), the duplicated headings, and typos ('Usefull') so the document renders correctly.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~560-line body spends significant tokens explaining concepts Claude already knows — a full paragraph defining 'context window' ('The “context window” refers to the entirety of the amount of text a language model can look back on...'), generic explanations of few-shot learning and chain-of-thought, and a persuasion-psychology rationale section ('LLMs are parahuman: Trained on human text containing these patterns'). This matches the anchor 'Noticeably verbose; several unnecessary explanations or padded sections'; it is above a 1 because the pattern examples and ✅/❌ comparisons do carry non-obvious information. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Most guidance is concrete: copy-paste prompt templates (the few-shot extraction example, the code review template with .format() usage, the RAG and validation f-string prompts) and paired ✅/❌ examples for each persuasion principle ('✅ Write code before test? Delete it. Start over. No exceptions.'). It falls short of 5 because several snippets are illustrative pseudocode ('# Process data / # Generate output in specified format') and the persuasion section is more descriptive than instructional; it is above 3 because the pseudocode is explicitly justified as a degrees-of-freedom illustration. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There are sequenced frameworks — the Progressive Disclosure levels 1-4, the instruction hierarchy ('[System Context] → [Task Instruction] → [Examples] → [Input Data] → [Output Format]'), and the Quick Reference five-question checklist — but no end-to-end workflow for actually applying the skill to design or optimize a prompt. The content reads as a topical reference with implicit sequencing, matching the anchor 'Steps listed but... checkpoints missing or implicit'. No validation cap applies since no destructive or batch operations are involved. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories), so the entire body is inline in SKILL.md. Section headers are clear and consistent, but three essentially independent documents (prompt engineering patterns, Anthropic agent prompting practices, persuasion principles) are stitched together with a bare '---' divider and clearly belong in separate reference files. This matches the anchor 'Some structure but could be better organized; content that should be separate is inline'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |