Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a lean, well-structured status-check skill with concrete paths, thresholds, and phase-detection logic and no unnecessary concept explanations. Its only real weakness is mild duplication between the status report format template and the example output, and the absence of explicit validate-fix feedback loops.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is well-organized with tables and numbered steps and assumes Claude's competence (no concept explanations), though the full status report format template plus a separate example output introduces some mild duplication that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance is provided — exact directory paths, frontmatter field to read (valid_until), explicit freshness thresholds (> today + 30 days), and a phase-detection table — with only minor gaps such as no concrete command for listing/counting files. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step Action sequence is clear with explicit phase-detection and evidence-classification logic, and it warns the user on stale/expired evidence; it stops short of explicit validate-then-fix feedback loops, hence 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A self-contained skill with no bundle files and well-organized sections covering structure, format, phase logic, and an example; per the rubric a sub-50-line single-purpose skill with no need for external references can score 5 with well-organized sections. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |