Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable reasoning-framework skill with a clear sequenced workflow and explicit validation/backtracking loops. The chief weaknesses are minor structural redundancy and a lack of a fully worked end-to-end example.
Suggestions
Consolidate the Core Loop and Execution Guide so the procedure is stated once, and trim the 'Remember' recap to avoid restating points already covered.
Add one fully worked example showing a complete atom tree (P1→R1→H1→V1→C1 with real content) instead of the '...' skeleton in the Output template.
Tighten broad triggers in the description (e.g. 'complex reasoning', 'structured thinking') with more distinctive phrases to reduce overlap with other thinking skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean prose that assumes Claude's intelligence (no over-explanation of chain-of-thought or backtracking basics), but the Core Loop and Execution Guide overlap and the 'Remember' section restates earlier points, so minor trimming is possible. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete atom schema, confidence-threshold tables, an output template, and real slash-command examples make the guidance actionable; held back from 5 because the output template is a '...' skeleton with no fully-worked end-to-end atom tree. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Core Loop is a clearly sequenced DECOMPOSE→SOLVE→VERIFY→CONTRACT→EVALUATE procedure with explicit validation checkpoints (VERIFY/EVALUATE) and a backtrack feedback loop, reinforced by a phased Execution Guide. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file with well-organized section headers and no nested references; not a 5 because the 5-anchor centers on multi-file reference signaling and there is minor structural redundancy. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |