CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

atomise

Atom of Thoughts (AoT) reasoning - decompose complex problems into atomic units with confidence tracking and backtracking. For genuinely complex reasoning, not everyday questions. Triggers on: atomise, complex reasoning, decompose problem, structured thinking, verify hypothesis.

85

2.28x

Quality

87%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

73%

2.28x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Evaluation results

83%

68%

Race Condition in Distributed Cache Invalidation

AoT output structure and atom fields

Criteria
Without context
With context

Phase 0 restatement

33%

100%

Premises extracted

0%

62%

Approach sketch

0%

50%

DECOMPOSE step present

16%

100%

Atom structure fields

0%

100%

Correct atom types

0%

100%

Hypothesis confidence cap

0%

25%

Confidence propagation

0%

62%

VERIFY step present

0%

71%

CONTRACT step present

0%

100%

KEY CHAIN present

0%

100%

ANSWER section

33%

100%

CONFIDENCE with explanation

66%

100%

RISKS section

100%

100%

Without context: $0.2378 · 1m 26s · 13 turns · 20 in / 3,970 out tokens

With context: $0.4718 · 2m 29s · 21 turns · 24 in / 7,509 out tokens

61%

14%

Authentication Flow Security Assessment

Confidence adjustment and backtracking

Criteria
Without context
With context

Multiple hypotheses decomposed

100%

100%

Hypothesis confidence cap

12%

100%

Verification steps present

62%

100%

Partial verification reduces confidence

33%

33%

Refuted path shows major reduction

55%

0%

Backtracking demonstrated

0%

0%

No forced conclusion

88%

100%

Adversarial verification style

87%

100%

CONTRACT after backtrack

0%

0%

ATOMS table present

0%

57%

RISKS section present

71%

100%

ANSWER and CONFIDENCE present

60%

70%

Without context: $0.2310 · 1m 33s · 11 turns · 16 in / 4,313 out tokens

With context: $0.6984 · 4m 14s · 20 turns · 27 in / 13,682 out tokens

75%

41%

Event Sourcing vs CRUD for a Financial Ledger System

Depth modes and domain verification style

Criteria
Without context
With context

Deep atom tree (7+ levels or high atom count)

25%

100%

Confidence threshold for conclusion >=0.85

100%

100%

Tradeoff analysis in verification

100%

100%

Feasibility checks present

87%

100%

Contract summaries <= 2 sentences

0%

0%

Multiple CONTRACT sections

0%

0%

Confidence is heuristic disclaimer

0%

55%

EVALUATE step documented

0%

62%

Confidence propagation from parents

12%

75%

KEY CHAIN present

0%

100%

RISKS / invalidation section

100%

100%

Atom types correctly labeled

0%

100%

Atoms table with all fields

0%

100%

Without context: $0.2859 · 1m 59s · 13 turns · 18 in / 5,466 out tokens

With context: $0.6850 · 3m 52s · 22 turns · 27 in / 12,695 out tokens

Repository
NeverSight/skills_feed
Evaluated
Agent
Claude Code
Model
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.