CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

data-driven-testing

DEPRECATED: Use testing-best-practices instead. This skill has been retired.

62

1.30x
Quality

41%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

99%

1.30x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./data/skills-md/0xbigboss/claude-code/data-driven-testing/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a concise, well-structured deprecation notice that clearly redirects to testing-best-practices and summarizes migration deltas. It scores well on conciseness and structure but lower on actionability and workflow clarity because it offers no executable guidance or process.

Suggestions

Add a one-line explicit migration step (e.g., 'Run /testing-best-practices and reuse the existing DDT fixtures') to raise actionability.

If legacy DDT artifacts must be converted, include a brief sequenced migration checklist with a verification step to lift workflow clarity.

Consider linking to the replacement skill's location or a migration reference so the redirect is navigable rather than name-only.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is a lean tombstone plus a tight 'What changed' list with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; only minor surplus in the changelog for a pure deprecation stub.

4 / 5

Actionability

It gives a concrete, scoped redirect ('Use testing-best-practices for all test design, test case generation, and test strategy work') with no executable code or commands, which is actionable but minimal for an instruction-only skill.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

There is no multi-step workflow, only a single unambiguous redirect; the simple-skill exception helps, but the body is informational rather than a sequenced process with checkpoints.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Content is under 50 lines with clear ## Deprecated and ### What changed sections and no external file references needed; well-organized with only minor structural gaps.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

21%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a deprecation tombstone rather than an active skill description: it redirects to another skill but states no capabilities, trigger phrases, or use-conditions for itself. It is clear for its purpose but scores low against a capability/trigger rubric.

Suggestions

If the skill must remain discoverable, add a one-line 'what' (e.g., the legacy DDT scope) so the description is not purely a redirect.

Include a natural trigger phrase such as 'Use when designing data-driven tests' so users have a keyword to match, even on a deprecated stub.

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming the migration scenario to lift completeness above 2.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the testing domain and a single concrete redirect ('Use testing-best-practices instead') but describes no capabilities of the skill itself, which is retired.

2 / 5

Completeness

It gives a vague 'what' (the skill is retired/redirects elsewhere) and provides no 'when' or trigger guidance, capping completeness well below the explicit-trigger anchor.

2 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It contains only a skill name ('testing-best-practices') and deprecation boilerplate; no natural keywords a user would actually say when needing the skill.

1 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It names a specific replacement skill and explicitly redirects, which is fairly distinct, though the bare testing domain could still overlap with related testing skills.

3 / 5

Total

8

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
NeverSight/skills_feed
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.