Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured deprecation notice that is concise and clear about its purpose. Its main weakness is the lack of a direct link or path to the replacement skill, which slightly reduces actionability and progressive disclosure. The 'What changed' summary is a nice touch for users who want context on the migration.
Suggestions
Add a direct relative link to the replacement skill file, e.g., `See [testing-best-practices](../testing-best-practices/SKILL.md)`.
Consider whether the 'What changed' section is necessary in the deprecated skill or if it belongs in the replacement skill's migration notes.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is extremely lean—it communicates the deprecation, the replacement skill, and a concise summary of what changed. No unnecessary explanation or padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It clearly directs the user to use `testing-best-practices` instead, which is actionable, but provides no link or path to the replacement skill and no concrete commands or code. For a deprecation notice this is adequate but not fully actionable. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | For a single-purpose deprecation notice, the workflow is unambiguous: stop using this skill, use the named replacement. No multi-step process is needed, and the single action is clear. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references `testing-best-practices` but does not provide a link or path to it. For a deprecation redirect, a direct reference (e.g., a relative link) would improve navigation. The 'What changed' section is useful context but could be omitted or linked externally. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |