Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, concise routing/recommendation skill that efficiently uses tables and a decision flowchart to guide tool selection. Its main strengths are token efficiency and clear workflow logic. The primary weaknesses are slightly schematic launch examples that could be more concrete, and references to external catalog files that aren't provided in the bundle.
Suggestions
Make the 'How to Launch' examples more concrete with realistic task descriptions and expected outputs, e.g., a complete Task tool invocation with an actual prompt string.
Include the referenced bundle files (agents-catalog.md, skills-catalog.md) or remove the references if they don't exist.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section is lean and purposeful. The decision flowchart, tables, and launch examples are all compact with no unnecessary explanation of concepts Claude already knows. No padding or verbose descriptions. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The tables and decision flowchart provide concrete guidance for tool selection, and the launch section shows specific invocation syntax. However, the launch examples are somewhat schematic rather than fully executable (e.g., pseudo-syntax for Skill/Task tool calls), and there's no complete worked example showing end-to-end tool selection and invocation. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The decision flowchart provides a clear sequence for choosing between skills and agents. The 'Match by Task Type' table acts as a practical lookup with clear escalation paths (skill first, then agent if needed). For a recommendation/routing skill, this is an unambiguous single-decision workflow. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references `./references/agents-catalog.md` and `./references/skills-catalog.md` for deeper content, which is good progressive disclosure design. However, no bundle files were provided, so these references are unverifiable. The inline content is well-structured with tables but the 'Additional Resources' section references files that may not exist. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |