zig-docs

Fetches Zig language and standard library documentation via CLI. Activates when needing Zig API details, std lib function signatures, or language reference content that isn't covered in zig-best-practices.

1.50x

Quality

82%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

72%

1.50x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with executable commands covering the main Zig documentation tasks, and is well-structured for navigation. It is slightly held back by redundant restated URL tables and a few missing validation steps for confirming fetch results.

Suggestions

Add a quick validation step after fetch commands (e.g. check for non-empty output or HTTP 200) so failures are caught before downstream processing.

Consolidate the Documentation Sources table with the inline code examples to remove duplicated URL patterns and tighten token use.

Consider moving the Common Module Paths table into a separate reference file to keep the overview leaner.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly lean command snippets with minimal padding and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but the Documentation Sources and Common Module Paths tables restate URL patterns already shown in code blocks, leaving minor trim opportunities.	4 / 5
Actionability	Provides copy-paste ready, fully executable curl/pandoc/jq commands with concrete module examples and version-tag variants covering the common fetch cases comprehensively.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Content is organized by task type with a fetch-then-grep sequence and a Troubleshooting section that provides fallback checkpoints for common failures, but there are minor validation gaps for confirming a fetch actually returned content.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Well-organized into clear single-level sections with external references only one level deep and no nested file references, though some reference tables could optionally be split out given the skill length.	4 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong, clearly stating both the capability and explicit activation triggers with a boundary clause distinguishing it from a sibling skill. Its only weak spot is specificity, where it names one main action (fetching) rather than enumerating multiple distinct capabilities.

Suggestions

Expand specificity by listing concrete capabilities beyond fetching, e.g. 'List standard library modules, extract doc comments, and fetch version-specific documentation'.

Consider adding common synonym trigger terms such as file extensions or aliases users might naturally say.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the Zig docs domain and the concrete action of fetching language and std lib documentation via CLI, but does not enumerate a comprehensive set of distinct actions, fitting the 1-2 concrete actions anchor.	3 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly states what it does ('Fetches Zig language and standard library documentation via CLI') and when to use it ('Activates when needing Zig API details, std lib function signatures, or language reference content'), satisfying both what and when with concrete triggers.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural trigger phrases like 'Zig API details', 'std lib function signatures', and 'language reference content' with a boundary clause, giving good keyword coverage though a few common synonyms are missing.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Occupies a clear Zig-documentation niche and explicitly disambiguates from zig-best-practices, giving it distinct triggers with minimal conflict risk.	5 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: NeverSight/skills_feed
Path: data/skills-md/0xbigboss/claude-code/zig-docs/SKILL.md
Commit: 2f57aec

Reviewed: about 23 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.