Content
80%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, highly actionable reference with concrete color, typography, and layout specs, weakened only by a missing output-verification step in the workflow and a dead template reference it instructs Claude to load.
Suggestions
Add a verification step to the workflow (e.g. after saving, confirm the HTML opens and renders with no overlapping legend) to close the validation gap.
Provide the referenced templates/template.html (or inline its essentials) so the "load the full template" instruction resolves to a real file.
If no bundle is intended, replace the skill_view template instruction with a self-contained inline skeleton to avoid a broken reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean reference material — exact rgba/hex fills, px font sizes, stroke widths, and spacing values — with no over-explanation of SVG/HTML concepts Claude already knows; nearly every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready specs (color table with rgba/hex, grid pattern SVG, double-rect masking steps, info-card HTML snippet, exact px layout rules), giving fully executable guidance for generation. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step generate-save-open workflow is clearly sequenced, but there is no explicit verification checkpoint (e.g. confirming the HTML renders) despite a flagged CRITICAL legend-placement constraint, matching the "steps listed but validation gaps" anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized into clear sections, but its single one-level-deep external reference — skill_view(... "templates/template.html") — points to a file that does not exist in the bundle, so the advertised progressive-disclosure target is broken. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |