Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with copy-paste commands, a clearly sequenced workflow, an explicit critique-then-rebuild feedback loop, and clean progressive disclosure to a single reference file. The only weakness is minor verbosity in the routing/arrival prose.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and action-oriented and assumes Claude's competence (no padding about fonts/SVG/vision), but a few sections like "Decide the flow" restate photo-arrival cases and could be trimmed, so it sits at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste commands appear throughout (segment, build, template, preview) with a concrete labels.json example and a Refine table mapping user phrases to exact flags; common cases are fully covered. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered main flow (1 Segment → 5 Deliver) includes an explicit validation step 4 ("Judge before delivering") with a rebuild feedback loop and a labeling checklist, matching the anchor for explicit validation and feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear sectioned overview keeps the workflow inline and pushes detailed symptom→fix material to one well-signaled, one-level-deep reference (references/troubleshooting.md, verified present), with easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |