Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, mostly lean merger-model template with concrete tables, a clear multi-step workflow, and a verification step. It scores solidly across all dimensions with only minor gaps around validation feedback loops and placeholder paths.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely efficient, using tables and terse bullets and assuming finance knowledge rather than explaining it, but the 'Data sources' history of the Cowork plugin context and the provenance 'Attribution' section add tokens that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance is provided via exact input lists, line-item tables, and a recalc command, but there is no executable openpyxl code and the recalc path is a placeholder ('/path/to/excel-author/'), leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence runs from inputs to output, and a 'Recalculate before delivery' verification step exists, but it is not integrated as an explicit validation checkpoint with a fix-and-retry feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The file is well-organized with clear section headers and only one-level cross-skill references, and no broken or nested references exist, but with no bundle files the content is entirely inline in a single ~130-line file rather than split into supporting files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |