Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable pipeline with strong progressive disclosure and disciplined validation/evidence rules. Its only real weakness is the absence of an explicit validate-fix-retry feedback loop, which keeps workflow_clarity at 4.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and information-rich, assumes Claude's competence (no explaining what OSINT or sanctions are), and uses executable commands over prose. Minor padding remains (the 'Adapted from' note and repeated rate-limit guidance in step 2 and the Tools section), so it stops short of a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every step ships copy-paste-ready bash commands with real flags, file paths, and documented output CSV columns, and entity-resolution/timing examples cover the common cases. It is not a 4 because there are no meaningful gaps in executability. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly numbered steps form a coherent pipeline (sources -> acquire -> resolve -> timing -> findings) with validation behaviors (0-row warnings, confidence tiers, p-value discipline, idempotent re-runs). It is not a 5 because there is no explicit validate-then-fix-then-retry gate loop of the form the rubric's anchor-5 example shows, even though validation is otherwise well handled. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a workflow overview that points one level deep to 11 real reference files (references/sources/*.md, verified present) and scripts, with explicit per-source 'cat' navigation in step 1. Content is appropriately split and easy to navigate, matching the anchor-5 example. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |