Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an unusually actionable, verification-first manual: exact commands, real bundle scripts, explicit success criteria, and hard-won pitfalls that assume Claude's competence. Its two weaknesses are inline bulk (API contract, prop schema, cua-driver notes) that belongs in references/ files, and a few padded, version- or host-specific narratives that could be trimmed or split out.
Suggestions
Move the cua-driver/foreground-delivery narrative, the inotify host-limit notes, and other version-pinned details into a separate reference file (e.g. references/computer-use-testing.md) and keep a one-line pointer in SKILL.md.
Move the full shape-props schema table and the ctx.editor/ctx.helpers API listing into references/ files, leaving only the prop-enum essentials and the script contract inline.
Tighten the Interactive UI section: the verification-boundary prose can be reduced to the two caveats as bullets, dropping narrative details like 'Verified by the Cua team on this exact v1.11.0 AppImage'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Most of the body is dense, non-obvious operational knowledge (per-call token reads, listener-fires-after-commit, required richText), but the cua-driver foreground-delivery narrative, the inotify host-limit details, and the version-pinned claim 'Verified by the Cua team on this exact v1.11.0 AppImage' go beyond minor over-explanation and time-sensitive detail is not isolated in a deprecated/old-patterns section — matching 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened'. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The skill gives copy-paste-ready curl commands with exact endpoints, headers, and inline token extraction; an executable document-script contract; a concrete hit-testing pattern; prop tables with validated required fields; and real, matching bundle files (scripts/main.js, scripts/counter.js, scripts/validate_shapes.mjs) — fully executable with specific examples covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Two workflows are explicitly selected by criterion (must the change survive reload?), followed by a 6-step Procedure and a dedicated Verification section with explicit success criteria (script-status digest equality, 'state: applied') and error-recovery paths (retry pending, read errorLogPath, report instead of claiming success) — clear sequencing with validation feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned and its three bundle scripts are clearly signaled and verified to exist one level deep, but ~270 lines of content that clearly belongs in separate reference files — the full script API contract, the shape-props schema table, and the computer-use/cua-driver notes — are inlined in SKILL.md, matching 'content that should be separate is inline' rather than level 4's 'most content is appropriately placed'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |