Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A thorough, highly actionable audit workflow with clear sequencing and validation, but it is long and keeps content inline that could be externalized into reference files for better progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Move the full Chinese report template (section 5) into a references file (e.g. report-template.md) and summarize its structure inline, reducing SKILL.md length and improving progressive disclosure.
Extract the Codex Agent dispatch prompt block (Step I.1) into a separate reference so the main body stays a lean overview.
Tighten explanatory prose in Steps I and J (e.g. the cross-validation purpose paragraph and confidence-level rationale) to one line each.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly tight checklists and commands, but ~320 lines with explanatory prose (the Step I purpose paragraph, confidence-level rationale, "explain why this matters for release determinism") that could be trimmed; not fully lean. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Highly actionable: concrete git commands (git rev-parse --verify, git diff --name-status), explicit keyword-scan patterns, exact filename templates, a full Agent dispatch code block, and a copy-paste report template. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clearly sequenced Steps 0–J with explicit validation checkpoints (ref verification, Codex readiness check, cross-validation/dedup rules); the audit is read-only so the destructive-operation cap does not apply. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into numbered sections, but it is a monolithic single file with no bundle references; the ~90-line report template and the Codex dispatch prompt are large static blocks that could be split into reference files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |