Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured navigation-style skill: an efficient overview table, a sequenced workflow with a verification checkpoint, and hard rules grounded in specific functions and files, all backed by real one-level-deep reference guides. The main gap is the absence of any executable code or command examples and of an explicit error-recovery feedback loop in the workflow.
Suggestions
Add one small executable example (e.g. a grep or test command like the referenced discovery test files) to make the guidance copy-paste actionable.
Turn the final verification step into a feedback loop: state what to do when URL validation or DApp provider notification checks fail (fix, then re-verify) before proceeding.
Optionally include a one-line "how to verify" command or checklist per platform suffix change so the workflow's checkpoint is concrete rather than implied.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: a quick-reference table, a six-step workflow, hard rules, and related-skill pointers, with every line carrying project-specific facts (function names, file paths, platform suffixes). There is no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching anchor 5's "every token earns its place". | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and project-specific — "Trace state through `useBrowserTabActions`, `useBrowserAction`, and `ServiceDiscovery`", "Do not bypass `uriUtils.validateUrl`", "webviews share `partition=\"persist:onekey\"`" — but there are no executable code snippets or commands. For an instruction-only skill this fits anchor 4 (mostly executable guidance with minor gaps) rather than anchor 5's copy-paste-ready examples. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Default Workflow gives a clear six-step sequence with an explicit final verification step ("Verify URL validation, deep link handling, DApp provider notifications, and persisted SimpleDB data are still coherent"). It falls short of anchor 5 because there is no explicit validate-then-fix-then-retry feedback loop, but it is above anchor 3 since a concrete checkpoint is present. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clean overview: a quick-reference table routing each topic to a real one-level-deep reference file under references/rules/ (all six linked files exist and contain substantive guides; module-map.md itself contains no nested references), plus concise inline workflow and rules. This matches anchor 5's clear overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references and easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |