Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured router skill: an executable shared detection script, explicit routing with aliases, a sequenced release flow with pre-publish verification steps, and clean one-level-deep disclosure into seven real, substantial reference guides. The main weaknesses are minor duplication between the Quick Reference table and Subcommand Routing, and the absence of an explicit failure/retry loop for the diff-check and audit gates.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient — a shared executable detection script, a routing table, and a compact flow diagram — with only minor trimmable redundancy: the Quick Reference table and Subcommand Routing section list the same seven subcommands with the same links, and the 'PRs target release/*, sync back to x via rebase' fact is stated in both the intro and Context. This matches 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed'; it is not 5 due to that duplication and not 3 because nothing is conceptually padded. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The Release Branch Detection section gives a fully executable, copy-paste-ready bash script with an explicit failure path ('exit 1'), and routing rules are concrete with both names and numeric aliases. It sits at 'mostly executable; concrete code or commands with minor gaps' rather than 5 because the user-confirmation step and the Typical Release Flow are described at a directive level rather than as runnable commands, with the real detail deferred to the reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Typical Release Flow sequences all seven steps, and validation checkpoints are present ('Before publishing — quick changeset review', 'Diff check passed — record release', audit recommended before publish, plus a y/n user confirmation after branch detection), so the destructive-operation cap does not apply. It matches 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps' — no explicit feedback loop (e.g., what to do when diff-check or audit fails) appears in the body, which keeps it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a genuine overview: all seven subcommand guides live in one-level-deep references/rules/*.md files, every one of which exists with substantial content (64–354 lines), and each is clearly signaled twice (Quick Reference table with 'When to use' plus explicit Subcommand Routing). The reference files point back to SKILL.md rather than nesting deeper, matching the 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references' anchor exactly. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |