CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

1k-code-review-pr

Review OneKey PRs and diffs for security, correctness, concurrency, React/RN pitfalls, and repository-specific regressions. Use for code review or 审查 PR.

74

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Critical

Do not install without reviewing

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a tightly written, highly actionable code-review skill: executable commands and exact templates throughout, a clearly sequenced workflow with explicit checkpoints, and clean one-level-deep reference structure. It earns full marks on every content dimension.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense reference material — commands, tables, and exact templates — with no filler explaining concepts Claude already knows (e.g. no "what is a PR" prose); nearly every line earns its place despite the length.

3 / 3

Actionability

It provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance throughout: `gh pr checkout`, `git diff origin/x...HEAD`, complete `gh api` jq queries, an exact report template, and a precise auto-fix diff format.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A 10-step numbered workflow with explicit sequencing is reinforced by MANDATORY scoring/report directives and an explicit confirmation checkpoint ("Only after explicit yes") before the outward-facing GH comment action, giving clear validation gates.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md acts as an overview/workflow hub while detailed checks are split into four well-signaled, one-level-deep reference files (all confirmed present), each described in the closing Reference Files section for easy navigation.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

85%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, complete, and well-scoped to the OneKey PR-review niche, with an explicit "Use for" trigger. Its only weakness is trigger-term coverage, which lists the core phrase and a bilingual variant but omits several natural phrasings a user might say.

Suggestions

Broaden trigger terms in the description, e.g. "Use for code review, reviewing a PR/diff, or 审查 PR/代码" so it surfaces for more natural phrasings.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Review OneKey PRs and diffs for security, correctness, concurrency, React/RN pitfalls, and repository-specific regressions" lists five distinct concrete review foci, matching the anchor for multiple specific concrete actions rather than a single domain+action description.

3 / 3

Completeness

The what is explicit (review PRs/diffs across named risk areas) and the when is given via an explicit "Use for..." trigger clause, satisfying both halves rather than leaving when implied.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

"Use for code review or 审查 PR" supplies natural terms (and a bilingual variant) but misses common variations such as "review a diff", "PR review", or "审查代码", so it sits at the some-relevant-keywords-but-incomplete level rather than broad coverage.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoping to "OneKey PRs and diffs" plus "repository-specific regressions" carves out a clear niche with distinct triggers that would not match generic review skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
OneKeyHQ/app-monorepo
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.