Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, well-structured reference: lean code examples, clear forbidden-vs-correct patterns, and properly signaled one-level-deep references to real bundle files. The main gap is abbreviated import placeholders in the code examples.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: no basic-concept explanations, no library intros, just compact forbidden-vs-correct code pairs and a quick-reference table where every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable forbidden-vs-correct code blocks cover the common cases and are largely copy-paste ready, but several import paths are abbreviated with '...' placeholders, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Each pattern's 'do this / not that' action is unambiguous and the Quick Reference table organizes navigation clearly; as a reference catalog rather than a multi-step workflow it lacks explicit validation checkpoints, keeping it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise overview table signals one-level-deep references to verified real files (references/rules/*.md, references/date-formatting.md, references/error-handling.md), with bulk detail appropriately split into those files for easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |