Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with a well-validated workflow and a real reference file, but it suffers from internal redundancy across overlapping workflow sections and overlap with the reference file. Consolidating the repeated workflows would improve token efficiency.
Suggestions
Merge 'End-to-End Delivery Requirements', 'Translation Workflow', and 'Existing Keys First' into a single canonical sequenced workflow to remove redundancy.
Trim the inline workflow detail that duplicates references/rules/i18n.md so the body stays a lean overview pointing to the reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but restates the same workflow across 'End-to-End Delivery Requirements', 'Translation Workflow', and 'Existing Keys First', creating noticeable redundancy that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete executable commands (`yarn i18n:search`, `yarn i18n:add`, `yarn i18n:pull`, `yarn op`), specific API endpoints (`GET /projects/{project_id}/languages`), and copy-ready code examples cover the common cases with only minor gaps in argument details. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 9-step end-to-end list is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (verify project name/ID, fetch languages, search before create, complete every locale, inspect the generated diff) and a feedback loop ('stop before upload and report the mismatch'). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is good with a clearly signaled one-level-deep reference to references/rules/i18n.md (a real 456-line file), but the body duplicates much of the reference's coverage rather than staying a lean overview. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |