Content
80%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and highly actionable with concrete code, token tables, and lookup patterns, reflecting strong token efficiency and copy-paste readiness. It loses points only on workflow validation checkpoints and on keeping reference material inline rather than in dedicated files.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step to the workflow, e.g. 'Compare the rendered UI against the Figma design and adjust spacing/colors/typography until they match.'
Move the token reference tables and component category list into a separate references file (e.g. references/tokens.md) and link to it from the body to improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding explaining basic concepts; token tables and code snippets all earn their place, with only minor restatement across the do/don't lists. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready path patterns, Read/Glob invocations, import snippets, mock-data arrays, and full token reference tables — fully executable and specific. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequenced 5-step workflow is present but lacks any validation/verification checkpoints (e.g., comparing rendered output against the Figma design). | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized, but the skill is over 50 lines with token and component reference material inline and no separate reference files, which would aid discovery. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |