Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, highly actionable guide with concrete repo paths, tool commands, and copy-paste-ready code patterns; its main weaknesses are a partially redundant do/don't section and the absence of a verification checkpoint in the workflow. Structure is solid, though the reference-style catalogs could be split into a bundled reference file.
Suggestions
Collapse the 'What NOT to do'/'What TO do' bullet lists into the 'Focus on UI First' numbered principles to remove the duplicated guidance and tighten the token budget.
Add a final verification step to the workflow, e.g. 'Compare implemented layout against the Figma design (spacing, colors, typography) and fix discrepancies before finishing', to support the 1:1 goal.
Move the component category catalog and token tables into a references/ file (e.g. references/components.md) and link to it, keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient — lean code snippets, terse token tables, no explanations of concepts Claude already knows — but the "What NOT to do"/"What TO do" bullet lists largely restate points 1-4 of "Focus on UI First, Data Later" (mock data, skip i18n/APIs, match the design). This matches 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed'. It is not a 5 due to that duplicated section, and not a 3 because the padding is localized rather than pervasive. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete file-path patterns ("packages/components/src/{category}/{ComponentName}/"), explicit tool commands ("Read: ...index.tsx", "Glob: ...stories/*{ComponentName}*.tsx"), and copy-paste-ready snippets for Stack layouts, spacing/color/font tokens, and mock data give mostly executable guidance. It is not a 5 because step 1 of the workflow ("Analyze the Figma design using Figma MCP") gives no concrete command or tool invocation, and not a 3 because virtually everything else is directly executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step Workflow (analyze → identify components → look up source/demo → create mock data → implement) is a clear, well-ordered sequence that links to the detailed lookup section. It is not a 5 because there is no explicit verify-against-design checkpoint (useful for a stated 1:1/pixel-perfect goal), and not a 3 because the sequence is complete and unambiguous, and the task is not destructive or batch-operational so no validation cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (no references/, scripts/, or assets/), and the ~150-line body is cleanly sectioned (Core Principles, Component Lookup, Quick Reference, Workflow) with consistent heading hierarchy. It is not a 5 because the full component-category catalog and token tables are inlined reference material that could live in a separate file, and the skill exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill exception; it is not a 3 because nothing is buried and the structure makes navigation easy. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |