Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear, validated multi-step workflow and concrete templates. Its weaker points are minor redundancy between the rules and anti-patterns sections and a monolithic single-file structure that could offload the template and MCP notes to referenced files.
Suggestions
Move the verbatim Chinese Output Template and/or Atlassian MCP notes into a referenced file (e.g. references/output-template.md) and link to it one level deep to improve progressive disclosure.
De-duplicate the context-preservation rules between 'Hard rules' and 'Anti-patterns' so each is stated once, trimming token cost.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and mostly assumes Claude's competence (team-flow context, silent-default rules, MCP gotchas all earn their place), but the Hard rules and Anti-patterns sections reinforce the same preservation rules twice, which could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready git commands, a verbatim Chinese output template, a code-change-to-handoff decision table, and specific MCP tool names — fully executable guidance rather than abstraction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A tickable 5-step checklist with explicit branching (Path A/B), one confirmation gate before the Jira write, and a halt-on-skip-items feedback loop give a clear sequence with validation checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | It is a single well-organized file with clear section headers and no nested references, but at ~130 lines the output template and Atlassian MCP notes are inline content that could be split into one-level-deep reference files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |