Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-organized project map: architecture tree, platform flags, key-file table, and a correctly wired one-level-deep reference for the filtering workflow. Main gaps are a generic Sentry API section Claude already knows, one placeholder snippet, and slight duplication between the inline quick reference and the reference file.
Suggestions
Trim or replace the 'Add Custom Context' section — standard Sentry API usage Claude already knows — with project-specific notes (e.g. which Sentry package/DSN each platform entry uses).
Remove the 'Error Filtering Quick Reference' section or reduce it to a pointer, since the same filter structures are fully documented in references/rules/ignoring-errors.md.
Replace the placeholder 'if (error.value?.includes(\'PATTERN\')) return true;' with a real example pattern from the codebase so the snippet is executable as written.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The architecture tree, platform-detection flags, and key-files table are project-specific facts Claude cannot know, so those tokens earn their place; however the 'Add Custom Context' section demonstrates standard Sentry API calls (addBreadcrumb, setUser, setTag) that Claude already knows. This is 'Efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed', not 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Real file paths, executable TypeScript snippets, and concrete filter structures (FILTERED_ERROR_TYPES Set, FILTER_ERROR_VALUES array) make the guidance mostly copy-paste ready. It falls short of 5 because the quick-reference snippet 'if (error.value?.includes('PATTERN')) return true;' is placeholder pseudocode rather than executable code. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Each task section points to a concrete key file, and the primary workflow (filtering errors) is delegated to a reference containing a sequenced 1-2-3 workflow. The body's own filtering guidance is fragmentary quick-reference snippets without an explicit sequence, matching 'Clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps' rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single reference (references/rules/ignoring-errors.md) exists in the bundle, is clearly signaled with a markdown link, and is one level deep; the body is well-sectioned under clear headers. It is not 5 because the 'Error Filtering Quick Reference' section duplicates filtering detail that already lives in the reference file, so content placement could be tighter. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |