Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality, deeply actionable reference: executable commands, exact file paths, validation-capable baselines, and clear rules with rationale. The main weakness is that all reference material — the StartupTiming label taxonomy, per-platform expected timelines, and bundle-size tables — lives inline in SKILL.md with no progressive disclosure into separate files.
Suggestions
Move the platform-specific StartupTiming label tables (Android-only, iOS-only, JS-side labels) and the expected-timeline baselines into a references/ file (e.g. references/startup-timing.md), keeping only the shared labels and phase-budget summary in SKILL.md with a clearly signaled link.
Extract the 'Split Bundle: main vs background Bundle Sizes' section into a reference file, retaining just the one-line impact summary ('main.jsbundle eval is the single biggest bottleneck') in the body.
Trim the historical narrative in the SWR 'Who writes an entry' section to the rule plus a one-sentence rationale, and drop or compress the iOS 'TBD, awaiting fixed build' placeholder until re-baselined.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with project-specific facts (namespace retention, bundle sizes, storage paths) that Claude cannot already know, and it assumes competence throughout. Minor trimming is possible — e.g., the 'the history behind them' narrative in the SWR section and the iOS 'TBD, awaiting fixed build' placeholder — so it sits just below the lean 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is copy-paste ready: exact log paths with resolution commands (`find ~/Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/... | xargs ls -t | head -1`), `adb shell run-as so.onekey.app.wallet cat files/logs/app-latest.log`, complete grep/sed/awk pipelines for timeline extraction, and specific file paths for every concern. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | 'Diagnosing Cold Start Regressions' is a clearly sequenced 6-step workflow with commands per step, measured baselines to validate against ('Compare phase durations against baseline'), and a symptom→likely cause→fix table that provides error-recovery feedback loops. Only blemish is Step 5's checklist skipping item 4. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Headers are abundant and navigation is possible (above anchor 2's 'minimal structure'), but no bundle files exist at all — roughly 200 lines of platform-specific timing tables, expected timelines, and phase budgets that clearly belong in separate reference files are inlined in SKILL.md, matching anchor 3 rather than anchor 4 which requires well-signaled external references. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |