Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, concise, and cleanly sequenced for a lightweight design-review skill, but its guidance stays high-level without concrete values or examples that would make it fully actionable.
Suggestions
Add concrete defaults or examples for the design tokens referenced (e.g., a sample type scale, spacing scale, or shadow/radius token set).
Turn the final verify step into an explicit feedback loop ('if a state is missing or layout breaks at a width, fix and re-verify').
Drop or condense the 'PilotDeck Migration Note' since it is provenance metadata rather than guidance that aids execution.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padding of concepts Claude already knows; the only trimmable part is the 'PilotDeck Migration Note', which is meta context rather than execution guidance, keeping it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps name concrete directives (spacing, type scale, color tokens, border radius, shadows) and a clear checklist, but there are no concrete values, code, or specific token examples, so key execution details are missing. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 6-step workflow is clearly sequenced and ends with a verify step ('Verify the result in a browser or preview surface when available'); the verify step is conditional with no explicit fix-retry feedback loop, so it does not reach 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no external references needed (no references/scripts/assets bundle present) and is organized into clear sections (Workflow, Review Checklist, Migration Note), meeting the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |