Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and well-structured with a clear four-step workflow and concrete scoring rules, but actionability is held back by the absence of executable Grep command examples. Adding one or two concrete search-command snippets would make the guidance copy-paste ready.
Suggestions
Add a concrete Grep example per search type, e.g. `Grep "author: Jane Doe" papers/**/*.md` for author search and `Grep -i "<keyword>" papers/` for content search, so guidance is executable.
Specify the papers directory path so the search target is unambiguous rather than 'the papers directory'.
Optionally show a short example of the expected result grouping/display format so Step 4 is reproducible.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean (~37 lines) with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (Goal, Workflow, Usage) earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It names the tools to use (Grep) and what to search (title/author/content/domain), and gives concrete point values for scoring, but provides no actual executable Grep command examples or file paths, so guidance is 'some concrete but incomplete; missing key details.' | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The four steps (Parse Query → Execute Search → Score Results → Display Results) are clearly sequenced and unambiguous; as a simple, single-purpose read-only skill under 50 lines it qualifies for the simple-skills exception despite lacking explicit validation checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the content is well-organized into clearly labeled sections (Goal, Workflow, Usage), which per the guidelines lets a sub-50-line skill with no external references score 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |