executive-summary-generator
Transforms complex business inputs into concise, C-suite-ready executive summaries using McKinsey SCQA, BCG Pyramid Principle, and Bain action-oriented recommendation frameworks. Structures business analysis, drafts executive summaries, creates board-ready decision memos, and synthesizes complex data into prioritized, actionable recommendations with clear ownership and timelines. Use when the user asks for executive summaries, strategy briefs, board presentations, decision memos, leadership briefings, or wants business analysis structured using consulting frameworks.
99
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that hits all the key criteria. It provides specific concrete actions, names distinct consulting frameworks that serve as strong differentiators, includes a comprehensive 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms, and occupies a clear niche that minimizes conflict risk with other skills. The description is detailed without being unnecessarily verbose.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'structures business analysis', 'drafts executive summaries', 'creates board-ready decision memos', 'synthesizes complex data into prioritized, actionable recommendations with clear ownership and timelines'. Also names specific frameworks (McKinsey SCQA, BCG Pyramid Principle, Bain). | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (transforms inputs into executive summaries using specific consulting frameworks, structures analysis, drafts memos, synthesizes data) and 'when' with an explicit 'Use when...' clause listing specific trigger scenarios. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes a strong set of natural keywords users would say: 'executive summaries', 'strategy briefs', 'board presentations', 'decision memos', 'leadership briefings', 'consulting frameworks', 'C-suite', 'business analysis'. These cover a wide range of natural user phrasings. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The description carves out a clear niche around consulting-framework-based executive summaries and C-suite communications. The specific framework names (McKinsey SCQA, BCG Pyramid Principle, Bain) and output types (board-ready decision memos, leadership briefings) make it highly distinctive and unlikely to conflict with general writing or analysis skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is an excellent skill that is concise, highly actionable, and well-structured. The output template with specific word targets per section, the quality checklist with measurable criteria, and the clear 4-step workflow with validation make this immediately usable. The only minor consideration is that the worked example is referenced but not included inline, which is actually the correct progressive disclosure choice.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section earns its place. No unnecessary explanations of what consulting frameworks are or how summaries work. The content assumes Claude understands business concepts and jumps straight to actionable structure, checklist, and template. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The output template is fully concrete and copy-paste ready with specific section word targets, formatting patterns, priority labels, and structured fields (Owner, Timeline, Expected Result). The quality checklist provides specific, measurable criteria (325-475 words, ≥1 data point per finding). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step workflow (Intake → Structure → Draft → QA) is clearly sequenced with explicit validation in Step 4 via the Quality Checklist. The QA step includes specific feedback loops: trim lowest-impact finding if over 500 words, flag gaps rather than estimating if data is missing. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is well-organized with clear sections (Core Approach, Quality Checklist, Workflow, Output Template, Worked Example) and appropriately references EXAMPLES.md for the full worked example rather than inlining it. One level deep, clearly signaled. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
- Repository
- OpenRoster-ai/awesome-agents
- Commit
010799b
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.