Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is an excellent skill that is concise, highly actionable, and well-structured. The output template with specific word targets per section, the quality checklist with measurable criteria, and the clear 4-step workflow with validation make this immediately usable. The only minor consideration is that the worked example is referenced but not included inline, which is actually the correct progressive disclosure choice.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section earns its place. No unnecessary explanations of what consulting frameworks are or how summaries work. The content assumes Claude understands business concepts and jumps straight to actionable structure, checklist, and template. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The output template is fully concrete and copy-paste ready with specific section word targets, formatting patterns, priority labels, and structured fields (Owner, Timeline, Expected Result). The quality checklist provides specific, measurable criteria (325-475 words, ≥1 data point per finding). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step workflow (Intake → Structure → Draft → QA) is clearly sequenced with explicit validation in Step 4 via the Quality Checklist. The QA step includes specific feedback loops: trim lowest-impact finding if over 500 words, flag gaps rather than estimating if data is missing. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is well-organized with clear sections (Core Approach, Quality Checklist, Workflow, Output Template, Worked Example) and appropriately references EXAMPLES.md for the full worked example rather than inlining it. One level deep, clearly signaled. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |