Creates sprint plans, prioritizes product backlogs using RICE/MoSCoW/Kano frameworks, generates capacity plans, writes user stories with acceptance criteria, and produces stakeholder-ready roadmaps. Use when a user needs to prioritize features, score backlog items, plan a sprint, groom stories, allocate team capacity, calculate story points, create a release roadmap, run RICE scoring, evaluate trade-offs between features, or prepare sprint review and retrospective materials.
88
86%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Produces concrete sprint planning artifacts: scored and ranked backlogs, capacity plans, sprint goal statements, user stories, stakeholder summaries, and risk logs. All outputs are copy-paste ready.
Collect from the user:
Apply RICE to each item and produce a ranked table:
| Feature | Reach | Impact | Confidence | Effort (pm) | RICE Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Onboarding flow redesign | 2000 | 2 | 80% | 1.0 | 3200 |
| CSV export | 500 | 1 | 70% | 0.25 | 1400 |
| Dark mode | 800 | 0.5 | 90% | 0.5 | 720 |
| SSO integration | 300 | 3 | 60% | 2.0 | 270 |
When to use alternatives:
Sprint capacity template
------------------------
Team size: 6 developers
Sprint days: 10 days
Raw hours/dev: 8 h/day × 10 days = 80 h
Overhead (20%): − 16 h (standups, planning, review, retro, Slack)
Net hours/dev: 64 h
Planned absences: − 8 h (1 dev out 1 day)
Total net capacity: (6 × 64) − 8 = 376 h
Velocity target: 42 story points (from 6-sprint rolling average)
Buffer (15%): Reserve ~6 pts for unplanned work
Committable points: 36 ptsAdjust the 20% overhead factor up (to 25–30%) for teams with heavy meeting cultures or onboarding new members.
Template:
This sprint we will [deliver X] so that [user/business outcome Y], which we will verify by [measurable criterion Z].
Example:
This sprint we will ship the redesigned onboarding flow so that new users reach their first "aha moment" within 5 minutes of sign-up, verified by a ≥15% improvement in Day-1 activation rate in our analytics dashboard.
Template:
Title: [Short label]
As a [persona], I want [action] so that [benefit].
Acceptance Criteria:
- [ ] Given [context], when [event], then [expected outcome]
- [ ] Given [context], when [edge case], then [expected behaviour]
- [ ] Performance: [response time / load constraint if applicable]
- [ ] Accessibility: [WCAG level or screen-reader requirement]
Story Points: [estimate]
Dependencies: [upstream stories or teams]Example:
Title: CSV export for reports
As a finance analyst, I want to export any report as a CSV
so that I can process data in Excel without manual copy-paste.
Acceptance Criteria:
- [ ] Given a report is open, when I click "Export → CSV", then a .csv
file downloads within 3 seconds for datasets up to 10,000 rows.
- [ ] Given a report has no data, when I click export, then I see
"No data to export" and no file downloads.
- [ ] Column headers in the CSV match the on-screen column labels exactly.
Story Points: 3
Dependencies: Report API v2 (Team Platform, available sprint N+1)Place items into one of four quadrants: Quick Wins (high value, low effort → do this sprint), Strategic Bets (high value, high effort → phase and plan), Fill-ins (low value, low effort → slot if capacity allows), Time Sinks (low value, high effort → reject or redesign).
| Category | Action |
|---|---|
| Must-Have | Ship immediately; failing here kills trust |
| Performance | Prioritise by ROI |
| Delighter | Invest when must-haves are solid |
| Indifferent | Deprioritise; free up capacity |
| Reverse | Remove or gate behind a setting |
Full copy-paste templates for the Sprint Kickoff Summary, Executive Progress Update, Risk Log, and Sprint Retrospective Output are maintained in the companion TEMPLATES.md file. Use those when producing stakeholder communications, tracking risks, or formatting retro outputs.
010799b
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.