Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured design skill with a concrete staged workflow, explicit validation gates, and clean one-level-deep progressive disclosure into four real reference files. Its main weakness is verbosity in the abstract design-philosophy sections, which could be condensed without losing the skill's unique editorial value.
Suggestions
Condense the 设计判断原则 and 设计知识的使用方式 sections into tighter imperative rules; the abstract prose (e.g. '优雅不等于少,也不等于多') restates design judgment Claude largely already applies.
Move the most philosophical design principles into a reference file (e.g. references/01) and keep SKILL.md focused on the actionable workflow, contract, and rules, reducing token load at the top level.
Convert remaining principle statements from descriptive ('文字系统承载页面性格') to prescriptive checklist form ('字体配对须非通用组合;建立字阶并设定字重/字宽/间距') to tighten and increase actionability.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The procedural sections (工作流, plan.md 必须包含, HTML 要求) are efficient, but the 设计判断原则 and 设计知识的使用方式 sections are abstract design philosophy (e.g. "让文字排印本身成为设计中可被记住的一部分", "优雅不等于少,也不等于多") that elaborates on judgment rather than adding only what Claude does not know, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only skill it gives concrete, specific guidance: a staged 8-step workflow, a compact token system with named fields (Color = 4-6 hex, Type = display/body/utility/mono, ASCII wireframe, Signature), and an enumerated set of required plan.md sections — actionable and template-ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Eight clearly sequenced steps with explicit gates — "没有完整 plan 不动 HTML", "checklist 是开工前的契约,不是事后补救" — and a fix-loop review ("按检查角度逐项检查;未通过就修正"), matching the anchor for clear sequence with validation steps and feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body points to four real one-level-deep reference files (references/01–04), each clearly signaled at an exact workflow stage (e.g. "brainstorm 短设计计划前,读 references/01-aesthetic-direction.md"), with the overview kept inline and details appropriately split. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |