Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality, executable skill body: lean directive prose, copy-paste commands, a well-sequenced workflow with validation and recovery, and sensible file split. Main room for improvement is trimming the 硬规则 redundancy and moving more detail into reference files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense, directive prose that assumes Claude's competence (no explanation of what PPT/PPTX is) with concrete commands; the main redundancy is the 硬规则 checklist restating rules already stated inline, which keeps it just short of fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready commands with exact paths, flags, and a concrete size ('2752x1536') for resume_scan.py, sanitize_prompt.py, build_pptx.py, and the image_generate.py fallback, plus an explicit output file layout. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 4-step workflow with explicit validation/recovery checkpoints (resume_scan before resuming, sanitize_prompt per page, per-page heartbeat, record-failure-and-continue, partial-state handling) and a hard-rules checklist — including feedback loops for this batch operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with clearly signaled, one-level-deep references to bundle scripts that exist (resume_scan.py, sanitize_prompt.py, build_pptx.py); minor gaps are the two externally-referenced files (capability-policy.md, image_generate.py) outside the bundle and some inline directive lists that could live in references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |