Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, highly actionable diagnostic spec with exact commands and clearly partitioned hard/soft checks; the only gap is an implicit rather than explicit fix-and-revalidate feedback loop.
Suggestions
Make the feedback loop explicit in the Output section: after interactively filling .env, state that the doctor should be re-run (or sn-ppt-entry retried) to confirm all hard checks now pass.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and bullet-driven with no padding — it never explains what .env files, API keys, or Node are, and every line earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The Invocation section gives copy-paste-ready commands with all flags ('--non-interactive', '--env-path /custom/.env') and the checks name exact env vars and a concrete version gate ('node --version >= 18'). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence exists (run checks → read report → on hard-check failure, interactive .env fill) with the 'When to use' triggers framing it, but the fix-then-reconfirm feedback loop is only implied rather than spelled out as an explicit checkpoint. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At ~45 lines with no bundle files and well-labeled sections (When to use, Hard checks, Soft checks, Invocation, Output, Does NOT), the single-file overview is appropriately organized with no need for external references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |